It seems that my argument for God will consist of two or three stages.
First to show that mechanism leaves out the teleological aspect of reality and that we need a metaphysics that makes room for something like emergence. Even a evolutionary metaphysics is less wrong than a mechanistic metaphysics.
Secondly, to give an internal critique of an evolutionary metaphysics: to show that classical theism (i.e., the argument for a unique, infinite, unchanging supreme being) is required to account for teleology in nature.
First to show that mechanism leaves out the teleological aspect of reality and that we need a metaphysics that makes room for something like emergence. Even a evolutionary metaphysics is less wrong than a mechanistic metaphysics.
Secondly, to give an internal critique of an evolutionary metaphysics: to show that classical theism (i.e., the argument for a unique, infinite, unchanging supreme being) is required to account for teleology in nature.
Comments