Daniel Dennett calls for the naturalistic study of religion. I'm all for it, if by "natural" you mean the natural capacity of human beings to look for the infinite. I propose that -- before you do a naturalistic analysis of religion -- you do that sort of analysis of mathematics. In particular, give an account of how, when you know a number or equation, you can know that someone else at a different place and time cab be aware of the same number/equation/and of its unchanging truth. Once you've given an adequate account of this, you might be ready to ponder religion's quest for a being most perfect and all knowing.
Commentary and discussion regarding science, faith and culture by Leo White
Comments