Skip to main content

representations of hierarchical relations between powers

Aristotle talked about higher powers appropriating or encompassing the operations of lower powers in a manner analogous to the way in which a five-sided figure contains the makings of a four-sided figure--and more besides.  Well, that's a kind of model/game of life in which the higher and lower levels of operation are (albeit inadequately) represented.  But maybe there's a way of representing the Aristotlelian understanding of the hierarchy of powers.  Maybe that way is a kind of multidimensional representation, such that a line is seen as belonging to a plane, which in turn is seen as belonging to a solid, which itself is seen as being more than just the sum of many such planes.  The higher is in a sense  greater than the lower in this sort of analogy.  Is that an insight, or is that an example of "Analogies Gone Wild"?  Maybe there's some other way to convey, somewhat visually, the way powers are interrelated in a hylomorphic understanding of life forms.

Hmmmmmmmmmn...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

P F Strawson's Freedom and Resentment: the argument laid out

Here is a summary and comments on the essay Freedom and Resentment by PF Strawson.  He makes some great points, and when he is wrong, it is in such a way as to clarify things a great deal.  My non-deterministic position is much better thanks to having read this.  I’ll summarize it in this post and respond in a later one. In a nutshell: PFS first argues that personal resentment that we may feel toward another for having failed to show goodwill toward us would have no problem coexisting with the conviction that determinism is true.  Moral disapprobation, as an analog to resentment, is likewise capable of coexisting with deterministic convictions. In fact, it would seem nearly impossible for a normally-constituted person (i.e., a non-sociopath) to leave behind the web of moral convictions, even if that person is a determinist.  In this way, by arguing that moral and determinist convictions can coexist in the same person, PFS undermines the libertarian argument ...

Dembski's "specified compexity" semiotics and teleology (both ad intra and ad extra)

Integral to Dembski's idea of specified complexity (SC) is the notion that something extrinsic to evolution is the source of the specification in how it develops. He compares SC to the message sent by space aliens in the movie "Contact." In that movie, earthbound scientists determine that radio waves originating in from somewhere in our galaxy are actually a signal being sent by space aliens. The scientists determine that these waves are a signal is the fact that they indicate prime numbers in a way that a random occurrence would not. What is interesting to me is the fact that Dembski relies upon an analogy with a sign rather than a machine. Like a machine, signs are produced by an intelligent being for the sake of something beyond themselves. Machines, if you will, have a meaning. Signs, if you will, produce knowledge. But the meaning/knowledge is in both cases something other than the machine/sign itself. Both signs and machines are purposeful or teleological...