Skip to main content

two applications of the argument for a first mover

One can apply it to the mathematized, mechanistic universe... showing it needs a pusher of sorts.
But such an argument may be embarrassed by momentum (as I am by my spellllling), etc.

Secondly one can apply it to entelecheia-rich universe:  here the first mover is a final cause.  But there is also the need for the first moving mover, which is not pushed but acts for the sake of a final cause.  And that final cause is an unmoved mover.  The latter is a more adequate consideration of motion.

Comments

Leo White said…
The first application would be only slightly embarrassed by momentum, as there is plenty of acceleration (both positive and negative) going on. But this application would be pretty defective simply because nature is not a machine.